by
cj592
@ 2006-04-12 - 14:26:53
In the paper there is a section where they rate the past (and present) Doctor Whos.
For the full article incuding reasons click here
But to recap they are as follows
| Doctor |
Rating |
| William Hartnell |
8 out of 10 |
| Patrick Troughton |
6 out of 10 |
| Jon Pertwee |
8 out of 10 |
| Tom Baker |
9 out of 10 |
| Peter Davison |
2 out of 10 |
| Colin Baker |
3 out of 10 |
| Sylvester McCoy |
1 out of 10 |
| Paul McGann |
4 out of 10 |
| Christopher Eccleston |
10 out of 10 |
| David Tennant |
6 out of 10 |
How could they rate Peter Davison so low? Even lower than Colin Baker! Peter Davison was my favourite doctor, and Slvester McCoy got better during his run- I enjoyed Ghostlight and the Wolves of Fenric. TO be honest, although I liked Tom Baker, I don't think he was as great as some people think. Colin Baker's TV stories weren't good I grant you but his audio stories are much better. And it's hard to judge Paul McGann, but once again his audio stories are good.
So here are my ratings
| Doctor |
Rating |
| William Hartnell |
6 out of 10 |
| Patrick Troughton |
7 out of 10 |
| Jon Pertwee |
7 out of 10 |
| Tom Baker |
7 out of 10 |
| Peter Davison |
8 out of 10 |
| Colin Baker |
4 out of 10 |
| Sylvester McCoy |
6 out of 10 |
| Paul McGann |
4 out of 10 |
| Christopher Eccleston |
9 out of 10 |
| David Tennant |
9 out of 10 |
I'm giving Tennant a high score because I have high hopes 